Best Criminal Barrister Site Top Banner Image

0207 440 8888

Email Me

Video conferencing
also available

Home Areas of Crime Testimonials About Me Contact

Chambers of

2 Bedford Row, London,


Tel: 0207 440 8888

Fax: 0207 242 1738

Video Conferencing Also Available

Best Criminal Defence Barrister QC | HOME ] | Best Criminal Advocate
Best Criminal Fraud Defence Barrister

Best Bribery & Corruption Fraud Defence Barrister
Best Money Laundering Fraud Defence Barrister
Best Criminal & Fraud Appeals Barrister | Best Murder Barrister

Best Manslaughter Barrister
Best Disciplinary Tribunals Barrister | Best Drugs Barrister
| Howard Godfrey QC - About | Contact
website design & SEO By GoogleTop10

Terms such as "best" and
"top" and "leading" are
used for search engine optimisation (SEO) purposes, and I make no express or implied
representation that I am
the "top" or the "best" or
the "leading" barrister
in any area of law.

Criminal Advocate, Par Excellence

Howard Godfrey QC

Privacy Policy

Fraud Barrister

Video clip thumbnail image for Howard Godfrey QC - best fraud defence barrister - London and UK - Leading Expert Specialist Lawyer

 Appeals Barrister

Video clip thumbnail image for Howard Godfrey QC - best criminal & fraud appeals barrister - London and UK - Leading Expert Specialist Lawyer

Murder Barrister

Video clip thumbnail image for Howard Godfrey QC - best murder & manslaughter barrister - London and UK - Leading Expert Specialist Lawyer


Video clip thumbnail image for Howard Godfrey QC - best criminal defence barrister - London and UK - Leading Expert Specialist Lawyer

As one of the UK’s best manslaughter barristers, Howard Godfrey QC has acted for defendants in the whole range of situations from which manslaughter charges can arise, including death by dangerous/careless driving, gross negligence (for example, a drunk pilot or failing hotel fire alarms), unlawful act manslaughter (for example, a punch to the jaw which leads to death).

Sometimes a manslaughter verdict is a lesser alternative in a murder case. But often people charged with pure manslaughter feel completely out of their depth because they have never been involved with the criminal law before. Often the first question to consider is: was the client really responsible for the person’s death?

These can be very complicated cases to properly defend. Sometimes the argument is that the client’s actions did not lead to the death. In other cases the issue is whether the client was reckless towards the victim, or whether he was in breach of a duty owed to the person who died.

In many of these cases expert scientific or medical evidence plays a great part, whether called by the prosecution, the defence, or (often) both. In this type of work it is essential to be able to understand these areas of expertise, and use them, where possible, to the client’s advantage.

Some Sample cases:

Death from Fight - No Case to Answer [ H ]

‘H’  18 year old youth charged with murder and manslaughter on ‘joint enterprise’ basis after a fight between groups in a pub resulted in the death of one youth from head injuries caused mainly by being beaten with a billiard cue. Successful submission of ‘no case to answer’ at end of prosecution case because of unreliability of CCTV and eye witness evidence. Verdicts of Not Guilty to both Murder and Manslaughter directed by trial judge.

Corporate and Gross Negligence Manslaughter - No Case to Answer

Zeebrugge Ferry Disaster: The car ferry, the Herald of Free Enterprise, capsized in Zeebrugge Harbour after the loading doors had been left open. 193 passengers and crew died and many survivors became seriously ill with resulting post traumatic stress disorder.  There followed a trial of the shipping company for corporate manslaughter and of some individuals for gross negligence manslaughter. The judge ruled that there was no case to answer against the company and the main individual defendants. The law has since been changed. There were also multiple claims for damages by survivors resulting in substantial awards.

Insurance Fraud Arson - Reduced From Murder to Manslaughter [
F ]

This was a fraudulent insurance claim that went wrong. A factory containing a large quantity of valuable goods that were insured was set ablaze in order to obtain an enormous  insurance payout. It resulted in a trial for murder and arson, after occupiers died in the blaze. The defendant was acquitted of murder but convicted of unlawful act manslaughter.

One of the UK’s Best Manslaughter Barristers


assualt & battery
not guilty

corporate manslaughter
no case to answer

insurance fraud killing
reduced to manslaughter


Legal 500 UK logo for best manslaughter barrister Howard Godfrey QC

Distills and plots
a course through
the most complex of work with ease”

Return to Home Page: Best Criminal Barrister

Return to Areas of Crime: Best Criminal Advocate


If you or a family member, would like representation by one
of the UK’s very best money laundering barristers and QC’s,

… please feel free to
contact me for
 an initial conversation.

Contact Me

Howard Godfrey QC

- one of the UK’s -

Best Manslaughter

2014 Chambers UK Directory logo for best appeals barrister Howard Godfrey QC

Leading Individual