0207 440 8888
Howard Godfrey QC
2 Bedford Row, London,
Tel: 0207 440 8888
Fax: 0207 242 1738
Video Conferencing Also Available
Terms such as "best" and
"top" and "leading" are
used for search engine optimisation (SEO) purposes, and I make no express or implied
representation that I am
the "top" or the "best" or
the "leading" barrister
in any area of law.
Criminal Advocate, Par Excellence
As one of the very best fraud barristers in the UK, Howard Godfrey QC has an extraordinary range and depth of experience in this area, both nationally and internationally.
There are many types of fraud case, many of which are tax frauds where the defendants are Directors or employees of companies.
Howard’s experience spans the entire range of fraud, and includes both tax frauds and other frauds:
1. Conspiracies to defraud
2. False accounting
3. Insider dealing
4. Insolvency/liquidation frauds
5. Trading whilst insolvent
6. Boiler room (worthless shares) frauds
7. Mortgage frauds
8. Building and maintenance contract frauds
Over the years HMRC has become a very efficient and enthusiastic prosecution force. Many tax avoidance schemes that would have only ever been challenged in the civil courts are now regarded as criminal tax evasion and prosecuted as such.
Honest business people and professional advisors can, without realising, become involved in such schemes. So too can honest traders become implicated in massive VAT frauds, devised and controlled by people they’ve never even met.
Other types of fraud case are prosecuted by specialist departments such as the Serious Fraud Office and the Crown Prosecution Service. As with tax fraud the defence has to be prepared with great care. The job of the defence QC is to “see the wood for the trees” and identify the critically important elements for the client.
Very often in fraud cases many of the facts are not denied. What is in dispute in these cases is the client’s knowledge of the fraud and his state of mind at the material time. These cases all require the prosecution to prove that the defendant acted dishonestly and it is this issue that is most often crucial to the defence case.
Early advice as to the best tactics when there is an investigation underway is critical, and Howard Godfrey’s advice is often sought at this stage, long before any final decision to prosecute is taken.
K was the main defendant in the case, and was the CEO of a housing charity. He and the directors of a building company were tried for conspiracy to defraud the charity in relation to house building and maintenance contracts. The two co-
This was the biggest excise duty fraud case. A was a dealer in imported wines and spirits. He was charged with conspiracy to cheat HMRC. Lengthy pre-
K was an accountant and company director alleged to have been involved in a dishonest tax saving scheme. The case involved the flotation of companies, and the fraudulent ‘ramping’ up of the share price to unrealistic levels. The shares were then gifted to charities at an inflated value resulting in a major tax deduction by clients of the firm, and a large tax loss to HMRC. K did not give evidence. He was the only one of the accountant defendants to be acquitted by the jury.
G had been the senior partner of a large firm of solicitors. He was prosecuted for a multi million pound fraud in relation to dishonest schemes to avoid stamp duty being paid by property buyers. Pressure for disclosure of information resulted in HMRC eventually conceding that the lost tax had in fact been repaid! In the light of that new concession, the judge was asked if he would pass a non-
“Distills and plots
a course through
the most complex of work with ease”
If you or a family member, would like representation by one
of the UK’s very best money laundering barristers and QC’s,
… please feel free to
contact me for
an initial conversation.